Skip to main content
ValyouValyou.

MVP (Minimum Viable Product)

A version of a product with just enough features to satisfy early customers and gather feedback for future development.

A Minimum Viable Product (MVP) is a version of a product with just enough features to satisfy early adopters and gather validated learning about customer needs. It's not a half-baked product. It's a strategic approach to building products efficiently.

The MVP Philosophy

The idea comes from Lean Startup methodology: instead of spending months building a full product that might not meet market needs, build the smallest thing that tests your core assumptions.

Traditional approach: Build everything → Launch → Hope customers want it

MVP approach: Build core feature → Launch → Learn → Iterate

What an MVP Is NOT

  • A prototype (which isn't functional)
  • A half-finished product
  • A buggy product
  • A product with no value

An MVP should be viable. It must actually solve a problem for real users.

Benefits of the MVP Approach

Faster Time to Market

Get a product in users' hands quickly.

Reduced Risk

Test assumptions before major investment.

Real User Feedback

Learn from actual usage, not hypothetical opinions.

Efficient Resources

Don't build features nobody wants.

Flexibility

Easier to pivot when you haven't built everything.

How to Build an MVP

1. Identify the Problem

What specific problem are you solving?

2. Define Core Value

What's the one thing your product must do?

3. List Features

Everything you could include.

4. Prioritize Ruthlessly

What's essential vs. nice-to-have?

5. Build the Minimum

Only what's needed to test the hypothesis.

6. Launch and Learn

Measure usage, gather feedback, iterate.

MVP Examples

Dropbox: Started with a video demonstrating the concept, gauging interest before building.

Airbnb: Founders rented out their own apartment to validate demand.

Zappos: Founder photographed shoes at stores and bought them after orders came in.

When MVP Doesn't Work

  • Safety-critical products
  • Highly regulated industries
  • When "minimum" would damage the brand
  • When competitors have feature parity expectations